This deserves a longer answer than I am giving, but let me start with a few comments. First, this is one of the two main reasons, at least for me, why the guerrilla warfare model does not do anything for me. It leaves exposed to attack, part of what I am trying to defend.

This is why I advocate a "base camp" model, with a number of families and collection of patriots. One, that is easier to defend than stashes and people spread all over the place. Second, it is much easier to survive as a group - the collection of skills will be more diverse and I do "living history", which is more than Civil War reenacting and such - one of the lessons I learned in operating a 19th century farm is that is takes 2 to 4 people to make it work, and that is without fighting off "Indians".

Of course, the downside is that a fixed position is a vulnerability in that it defines your AO and makes us easier to target. However, that supposes that an opponent has sufficient resources to come after you in strength. As the S really HTF, I anticipate a widespread case of disorder, meaning a government entity has many problems to "deal with", and a community watch group will either be too difficult to deal with or not high enough on the radar screen.